View a Chinese translation of this page here.
ADC Education and Practice is mainly, with the exception of our Equipment section, commissioned content. If you’ve got an idea for something to write, please do get in touch with the appropriate section editor before doing a lot of work on a paper.
The editors have developed some guidance on writing that you can view here.
ADC Education and Practice adheres to the highest standards concerning its editorial policies on publication ethics, scientific misconduct, consent and peer review criteria. To view all BMJ Journal policies please refer to the BMJ Author Hub policies page.
Articles are published under an exclusive licence (or non-exclusive licence for UK Crown and US Federal Government employees) and authors retain copyright. Articles can also be published under a Creative Commons licence to facilitate reuse of the content; please refer to the ADC Education and Practice Copyright Author Licence Statement.
BMJ and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health have a facility for transferring manuscripts among their paediatric journals. Authors submitting to the flagship journal Archives of Disease in Childhood can choose BMJ Paediatrics Open as an ‘alternate journal’.
Once authors agree for their manuscript to be transferred to another BMJ journal, all versions of the manuscript, any supplementary files and peer review comments will automatically be transferred on the author’s behalf. Please note that there is no guarantee of acceptance. Contact the editorial team for more information or assistance.
Article publishing charges
During submission, authors can choose to have their article published open access for 1,950 GBP (exclusive of VAT for UK and EU authors). There are no submission, page or colour figure charges.
For more information on open access, funder compliance and institutional programmes please refer to the BMJ Author Hub open access page.
Contact a section editor
Please review the below article type specifications including the required article lengths, illustrations, table limits and reference counts. The word count excludes the title page, abstract, tables, acknowledgements, contributions and references. Manuscripts should be as succinct as possible.
For further support when making your submission please refer to the resources available on the BMJ Author Hub. Here you can also find general formatting guidelines across BMJ and a formatting checklist.
Self-assessment questions: Epilogue
The merit of this section is in using high-quality image(s) to remind the readers about the important features of a common clinical problem and using MCQs to produce useful learning points and take-home messages. This is also a useful format for trainees as well as established authors.
We invite readers to submit cases accompanied by questions. The text should be no more than 600 words, and might be accompanied by one or two figures, preferably clinical images, though good-quality radiology figures will be considered, and 4 or 5 MCQs. Radiology images should be of a standard that paediatricians would be able to identify the important feature. Real-life cases must have parent/patient consent and be anonymised. Answers should be given, with a punchy learning point: 1 sentence each. Submissions will be peer-reviewed before publication. Authors will be credited in the journal.
Equipment QI reports
The aim of these reports is to showcase good practice in paediatric QI and to share experiences and learning. We are particularly keen to highlight both successes and failures, as it is often from the failures that we learn the most. The emphasis may be on small achievable projects led by frontline staff, not just large scale change.
Reports are intended for anyone interested in improving child health. We particularly hope this will inspire frontline clinicians to undertake their own QI projects. The focus is on learning and understanding the process of QI.
Style of the paper
The papers should be brief, to the point and informative, and they should be limited to one side of paper in the journal (700 words max). Our hope is that the paper would provide enough information to allow the QI work to be spread and others to make use of it.
Please use the following headings (in capitals) and address the points within each:
- Summary: Summarise your project and the clinical setting (one sentence) e.g. Implementation of a PEWs chart in a rural district general paediatric inpatient ward.
- The Problem: Why did you choose this project, what was the quality/safety issue? How did you identify the problem?
- Aims: What were the aims of your project? Be as specific and as SMART as possible.
- Making a Case for Change: How did you communicate the need for change? Who did you need to involve in your project and how did you do this?
- Your Improvements: Outline the changes and how you implemented them, including the QI tools/techniques used e.g. PDSA cycles. How do you know the changes you made resulted in improvement? What were the outcomes of your project and how will you ensure that they are sustained?
- Learning and Next Steps: What would you do differently next time and what were the secrets to success (where did you find support)? What are your next steps in this project- where next?
Equipped commissioning guide
The Equipped series of articles aims to introduce readers to core Quality Improvement concepts. Using Child Health examples, change theories, improvement models and relevant resources can be demonstrated and shared. There is a strong emphasis on practical suggestions to enable readers to embark upon their own projects.
All child health professionals looking to undertake quality improvement work and looking for an introduction to core QI themes with examples.
Good examples are:
Patient involvement in quality improvement: is it time we let children, young people and families take the lead?
Robertson S, et al.
Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2014;
Using data to improve care
Cheung CRLH, et al.
Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 2013;
These are good because:
- They use specific examples to highlight a QI theory or model
- The underlying theory is clearly explained in a practical way
- They are focused on supporting readers to undertake similar work
- They use illustrations and text boxes for clarity
Please feel free to include other authors provided their contribution is significant and adds value. Remember: “I’m sorry I wrote such a long letter; I didn’t have time to write a shorter one” – Abraham Lincoln, and take a look at this paper which changed the world in around 650 words.
Please include at least two, and preferably more, boxes, table and figures, and make use of full colour. Colour charges are not applicable in E&P. A common pitfall is to write a textbook chapter. Clues that you are doing this will include an overlong article, getting stuck in detail that only very expert readers need to appreciate, and the need for very many references. If you’re falling into this trap, and want help, then your commissioning editor should be able to assist you. Many authors find this advice helpful.
Your article will need to be submitted through the ScholarOne system. If you have been commissioned, please follow the instructions. Please note that as a peer reviewed journal, your article will undergo peer review. This allows us to ensure we are publishing high quality work, and our peer reviewers almost invariably help to improve papers.
Word count: maximum 3000 words excluding references, boxes, tables and diagrams.
Figures/tables: are encouraged
References: 30-40 should suffice
Problem solving in clinical practice
Public Health for Paediatricians
This series seeks to introduce key concepts in public health to child health professionals; to explain how these concepts relate to practicing paediatricians; to stimulate interest in, and signpost to further resources for, further learning around topics in child public health.
Predominantly paediatricians and paediatricians-in-training, but also to public health specialists and any health professional involved in the care of children and young people (including general practitioners, allied health professionals, and mental health professionals)
Style of paper:
These papers should fit the “15 minute consultation” papers format, in the Education and Practice (E&P) section of Archives of Disease in Childhood. This style tries to give a concise review of a particular topic in paediatrics.
A good recent example of an article in the Public Health series includes:
This paper was good because:
- its structure outlined key concepts in a digestible format;
- it drew attention to controversies, while giving the reader practical examples of why that might affect their clinical practice
Suggested common themes for articles in the series:
- Theoretical concepts for each topic
- Why is this topic relevant for practicing paediatricians and child health professionals?
- Real life examples which illustrate the topic, including the role of both clinicians and public health professionals respectively
- Priorities for research involving children and young people in the topic area
- Further educational resources, and opportunities to pursue practical involvement
- Please feel free to include other authors provided their contribution is significant and adds value
- Word count should not be more than 1500, and definitely no more than 2000 words, excluding references. (All text in boxes are excluded from this word count)
- No more than 20 references – strictly enforced.
- Include search strategies for the evidence base as an appendix or box where appropriate
- Please include at least two, and preferably more, boxes, table and figures. Text included in these do not contribute to the 2000 word limit.
- Please make use of full colour for figures and tables. The submission instructions mention a charge for colour: this is not applicable in E&P.
- A common pitfall is to write a textbook chapter. Clues that you are doing this will include an overlong article, getting stuck in detail that only very expert readers need to appreciate, and the need for very many references. If you’re falling into this trap, and want help, then your commissioning editor should be able to assist you.
- A specific comment about the 15 minute consultation style; the 15 minutes refers to the time that you, the expert, have with the reader.
- Your article will need to be submitted through the ScholarOne system. If you have been commissioned, please follow the instructions.
- Your article will undergo peer review, and journal instructions regarding conflict of interest and other statements would of course apply.
The BMJ Publishing Group journals are willing to consider publishing supplements to regular issues. Supplement proposals may be made at the request of:
- The journal editor, an editorial board member or a learned society may wish to organise a meeting, sponsorship may be sought and the proceedings published as a supplement.
- The journal editor, editorial board member or learned society may wish to commission a supplement on a particular theme or topic. Again, sponsorship may be sought.
- The BMJPG itself may have proposals for supplements where sponsorship may be necessary.
- A sponsoring organisation, often a pharmaceutical company or a charitable foundation, that wishes to arrange a meeting, the proceedings of which will be published as a supplement.
In all cases, it is vital that the journal’s integrity, independence and academic reputation is not compromised in any way.
For further information on criteria that must be fulfilled, download the supplements guidelines.
When contacting us regarding a potential supplement, please include as much of the information below as possible.
- Journal in which you would like the supplement published
- Title of supplement and/or meeting on which it is based
- Date of meeting on which it is based
- Proposed table of contents with provisional article titles and proposed authors
- An indication of whether authors have agreed to participate
- Sponsor information including any relevant deadlines
- An indication of the expected length of each paper Guest Editor proposals if appropriate