Lack of agreement on colour description between clinicians examining childhood bruising

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-1131(02)00097-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction. In child protection cases clinicians are often asked to describe and age bruises. This paper looks at both intra- and inter-observer variability in the description of childhood bruising. Methods. Fifty-eight bruises on 44 children were described by three observers, the bruises were then photographed and the same observers described the bruises at a later date. The descriptions were compared and classified in terms of complete, partial, or no agreement, both between observers and between the in vivo and photographic descriptions. Results. Complete agreement on colour description between two observers in vivo occurred in 27% of descriptions in vivo and 24% of photographs. Only 31% of descriptions completely agreed with the later description of a photograph of the same bruise. Conclusions. This marked variability in colour description, severely questions the practice of estimating the age of bruises especially from clinical photographs as evidence in child protection proceedings.

Introduction

Discrepancies between physical findings and the history given by carers are hallmarks of child abuse. Clinicians may therefore be asked by child protection and law enforcement agencies, as well as the court, to comment on the age of any bruise found during the examination of a child. To do this, the clinician must relate the colour of the bruise seen to that described in a recognised sequence of colour changes.1 Many clinicians will then use clinical photographs as part of the medical record to aid in the documentation of such injuries. Expert witnesses for the defence have only these photographs from which to give their opinion on the age of the bruise.

This study aims to identify how health professionals describe the colour of a bruise and to determine variations that may exist between the descriptions of different observers. It also examines intra-observer consistency in describing the colour of the same bruise in real life and then from a clinical photograph at a later date. Particular attention was paid to the colour yellow as the lack of yellow colouration in fresh bruises is a particularly consistent finding.[1], [2]

Section snippets

Methods

Children with bruises were recruited from the waiting room of the Accident and Emergency Department at the Royal Hospital for Sick Children in Edinburgh. The sample included children with minor complaints and their accompanying siblings. The bruising was not necessarily related to the reason for presentation to the department. Parental and, where appropriate, the child’s consent was obtained for recruitment.

The bruise was then photographed against a plain white sheet as the background by a

Results

Forty-four children with a total of 58 bruises were photographed. The sample contained 30 males and 14 females with ages ranging from 16 months to 14.25 years. Nine subjects had more than one bruise. Of the bruises, 11 involved the upper limb, 42 the lower limb, four the head, and one the trunk. All children were Caucasian.

The observers comprised of four middle grade doctors, nine staff nurses, and one medical student (LAM).

Discussion

Colour itself exists in an abstract, three-dimensional space, in which any colour has a ‘location’ determined by its position relative to the three cardinal axes of hue, saturation, and luminance. Whilst the basic principles of the neurophysiology underlying colour vision are understood, there is still a vast lack of evidence linking these mechanisms to our perception of colour in the world around us.3 It is not surprising therefore that this study demonstrates a large degree of variation in

References (5)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

1

L. A. Munang, P. A. Leonard, J. Y. Q. Mok, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Sciennes Road, Edinburgh EH9 1LF, UK.

View full text