Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Urine collection pads: are samples reliable for urine biochemistry and microscopy?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to validate the reliability of samples obtained with urine collection pads (UCP) for selected laboratory biochemical analyses, urine cell microscopy, and bedside semi-quantitative stick urinalysis. A series of laboratory experiments was performed to test agreement between urine concentrations, or results, before and after passage through a UCP (incubated for 37°C for 15 min). The following urinalyses were performed: electrolytes, calcium, phosphate, urate, osmolality, pH, protein, catecholamines, toxicology for drugs of abuse, stick urinalysis for glucose, ketones, protein, blood, leucocytes and nitrites, and microscopy for red and white cells. Close agreement was shown for all laboratory analyses except proteinuria, which was underestimated by, on average, 10% after UCP passage. However, stick urinalysis for proteinuria remains sufficiently reliable for clinical use. UCP substantially retain or destroy red and white cells, but stick urinalysis for blood and leucocyte esterase remains reliable. In conclusion, urine samples derived from UCP show good agreement across a clinically relevant range for the biochemical analyses undertaken in this study. Microscopy of UCP samples is unreliable for cellular material but semi-quantitative stick urinalysis for red and white cells is a satisfactory alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vernon S, Redfearn A, Pedler SJ, Lambert HJ, Coulthard MG (1994) Urine collection on sanitary towels. Lancet 334:612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis J (1998) Clean catch versus urine collection pads: a prospective trial. Pediatr Nurs 10:15–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Feasey S (1999) Are Newcastle urine collection pads suitable as a means of collecting specimens from infants? Pediatr Nurs 2:17–21

    Google Scholar 

  4. Macfarlane PI, Houghton C, Hughes C (1999) Pad urine collection for early childhood urinary tract infection. Lancet 354:571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liaw LCT, Nayar D, Pedler SJ, Coulthard MG (2000) Home collection of urine for culture from infants by three methods: survey of parents’ preferences and bacterial contamination rates. BMJ 320:1312–1313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rao S, Houghton C, Macfarlane PI (2003) A new urine collection method; pad and moisture sensitive alarm. Arch Dis Child 88:836

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rao S, Bhatt J, Houghton CH, Macfarlane PI (2004) An improved urine collection pad method; a randomised clinical trial. Arch Dis Child 89:773–775

    Google Scholar 

  8. Roberts SB, Lucas A (1985) Measurements of urinary constituents and output using disposable napkins. Arch Dis Child 60:1021–1024

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmad T, Vickers D, Campbell S, Coulthard MG, Pedler S (1991) Urine collection from disposable nappies. Lancet 338:674–676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mock D (1992) Rayon balls and disposable-diaper material selectively absorb creatinine. Am J Clin Nutr 55:326–330

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith GC, Taylor CM (1992) Recovery of protein from urine specimens collected in cotton wool. Arch Dis Child 67:1486–1487

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kirkpatrick JM, Alexander J, Cain RM (1997) Recovering urine from diapers: are test results accurate? Am J Matern Child Nurs 22:96–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kishel M, Lichty PNA (1979) Some diaper brands give false-positive test for PKU. N Engl J Med 300:200

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Partsch CJ, Aukamp M, Sippel WG (2000) Scrotal temperature is increased in disposable plastic line nappies. Arch Dis Child 83:364–368

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fitzgibbon MC, Tormey WP (1994) Paediatric reference ranges for urinary catecholamines/metabolites and their relevance in neuroblastoma diagnosis. Ann Clin Biochem 31:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bland JM, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet I:307–310

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hutton NM, Schreiner RL (1980) Urine collection in the neonate, effect of different methods on volume, specific gravity and glucose. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 9:165–169

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williams PR, Kanarek HS (1982) Urine evaporative loss and effects on specific gravity and osmolality. J Pediatr 100:626–628

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Muratore C, Dhanireddy R (1993) Urine collection from disposable diapers in premature infants: biochemical analysis. ClinPediatr (Phila) 32:314–315

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schoenle EG, Lang-Muritano M, Gschwend S, Laimbacher J, Mullis PE, Torresani T, Biason-Lauber A, Molinari L (2001) Epidemiology of type I diabetes mellitus in Switzerland: steep rise in incidence in under 5 year old children in the past decade. Diabetologia 44:286–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghazali S, Barratt TM (1974) Urinary excretion of calcium and magnesium in children. Arch Dis Child 49:97–101

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh J, Moghal N, Pearce SHS, Cheetham T (2003) The investigation of hypocalcaemia and rickets. Arch Dis Child 88:403–407

    Google Scholar 

  23. Simmons WK (1972) Urinary urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio as an indicator of recent protein intake in field studies. Am J Clin Nutr 25:539–542

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Adewusi SR, Tomiro SE, Akindahunsi AA (2002) Prediction of nutritional status by chemical analysis of urine and anthropometric methods. Nutr Health 16:195–202

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Matos V, Van Melle G, Werner D, Bardy D, Guignard JP (1999) Urinary oxalate and urate to creatinine ratios in a healthy paediatric population. Am J Kidney Dis 34:e1

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Abithol C, Zilleruelo G, Freundlich M, Strauss J (1990) Quantitation of proteinuria with urinary protein/creatinine ratios and random testing with dipsticks in nephrotic children. J Pediatr 116:243–247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Matos V, Van Melle G, Boulat O, Markert M, Bachman C, Guignard JP (1997) Urinary phosphate/creatinine, calcium/creatinine and magnesium creatinine ratios in a healthy paediatric population. J Pediatr 131:252–257

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Ian Marsh from the Toxicology Laboratory, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK whose laboratory provided anonymous adult urine samples containing drugs of abuse for toxicological analysis and to Mrs. Amanda Wilson, who typed the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter I. Macfarlane.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macfarlane, P.I., Ellis, R., Hughes, C. et al. Urine collection pads: are samples reliable for urine biochemistry and microscopy?. Pediatr Nephrol 20, 170–179 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-004-1709-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-004-1709-4

Keywords

Navigation