Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Introduction
Researchers aim to publish in the highest-ranking journal possible to enable wider dissemination and for career advancement. Journals are ranked in many ways (table 1), but scientific quality is not important for these rankings.
An excellent example is a now retracted (therefore uncitable) paper looking at a possible link between MMR vaccine and autism. This was published in one of the highest Impact Factor journals in the world and was subsequently found to be fraudulent. Prior to full retraction, it had gained 3563 citations, which increased the standing of that journal.
Ranking methods
Impact factor (IF) was one of the first critical evaluation systems developed to check journal quality, created in 1955.1 The 2-year journal impact factor is the ratio between the number of citations received in that year for publications in that journal that were published in the two preceding years and the total number of ‘citable items’ published in that journal during the two preceding years.2 Most famous journals have an IF around 60. The immediacy index performs a similar calculation, but only uses data from the last complete year.
The cited half-life is the number of years accounting for half of the current citations received by a journal. It can vary with several factors, for instance older journals will trend to a higher cited half-life.
H-index, or Hirsch’s Index, can rank individual researchers as well as …
Footnotes
Twitter @picpod_podcast
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement There are no data in this work