You are here

  • Home
  • Online First
  • Fifteen-minute consultation: Assessing the child with an elbow injury

Article Text

Article menu

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Best practice and Fifteen-minute consultations
Fifteen-minute consultation: Assessing the child with an elbow injury
  1. Sarah Edwards1,2,
  2. Damian Roland3,4
  1. 1East Midlands Emergency Medicine Educational Media (#EM3), Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
  2. 2Emergency Department, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
  3. 3Health Sciences, Leicester University, SAPPHIRE Group, Leicester, UK
  4. 4Children’s Emergency Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Paediatric Emergency Medicine Leicester Academic (PEMLA) Group, Leicester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sarah Edwards, East Midlands Emergency Medicine Educational Media (#EM3), Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK; drsarahedwards{at}hotmail.com

Abstract

This article aims to provide a concise summary of the key considerations when assessing a child with an elbow injury. Elbow injuries are common with acute elbow trauma, accounting for 2%–3% of all visits to the emergency department. This article will cover history, examination and key X-ray findings, along with a brief guide to management. It is hoped this article will help healthcare professionals who assess children with elbow injuries. Our work is applicable to those both in the hospital and community setting.

  • elbow injury
  • supracondylar fracture
  • pulled elbow
  • accident & emergency
  • musculo-skeletal

https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-316129

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Twitter @drsarahedwards, @damian_roland

    • Contributors SE developed and wrote the article. DR reviewed and edited the article.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient consent for publication Not required.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.