Responses

Download PDFPDF
How to use… an autism assessment tool
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Re:autism assessment tools- a (partial) misinterpretation

    As part of the team that undertook review of the paper prior to publication I would like to thank Alan for picking up this misinterpretation and to apologise to our readers for the mistake.

    It's entirely correct that a negative ADOS will be right - the patient will not have autism - about 88% of the time.

    The table 3 is misleadingly titled "prob that the test rules out autism" and should be "post test...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    autism assessment tools- a (partial) misinterpretation

    Carter and colleagues have done a superb job in summarising the theory and practice of tools used in assessing children for autism. Unfortunately their paper is marred by a mathematical error which, if left unchallenged, could undermine trust in the use of one such tool, the ADOS.

    According to the paper, the positive predictive value (ppv, i.e. the proportion of those who test positive who actually have the cond...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.