Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Honey, not dextromethorphan, was better than no treatment for nocturnal cough in children with upper respiratory infections.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

STUDY DESIGN

Design:

randomised controlled trial.

Allocation:

{concealed*}†.

Blinding:

blinded (outcome assessors, patients and healthcare providers [to dextromethorphan (DM) and honey], {data collectors, data analysts, and manuscript writers}†).*

Setting:

a university-affiliated paediatric practice in Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.

Patients:

{108}† children 2–18 years of age (median age 5 y, range 2–17 y, 53% girls) who had cough due to an upper respiratory infection (rhinorrhoea and cough for ⩽7 days) and whose parents scored ⩾3 points (somewhat) for ⩾2 of 3 questions on a 7-point Likert scale that assessed cough and sleep difficulty (0  =  not at all to 6  =  extremely). Exclusion criteria included signs and symptoms of asthma, pneumonia, laryngotracheobronchitis, sinusitis, or allergic rhinitis; reactive airways disease; chronic lung disease; use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; or use of an antihistamine or DM hydrobromide ⩽6 hours from bedtime or …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Source of funding: National Honey Board.

Footnotes

  • Reproduced with permission from