Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Fifteen-minute consultation: Management of albuminuria in children and young people with diabetes
Free
  1. Isabella Weber1,
  2. Cliodhna Myles2,
  3. A Emile J Hendriks2,3,
  4. M Loredana Marcovecchio2,3,
  5. Benjamin G Fisher3
  1. 1 School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  2. 2 Department of Paediatric Diabetes and Endocrinology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
  3. 3 Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  1. Correspondence to Isabella Weber; ifw25{at}cam.ac.uk

Abstract

Albuminuria is a marker of diabetic kidney disease. Raised albuminuria in children and young people with diabetes is associated with an increased risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications. This review provides guidance for paediatricians caring for children and young people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes on screening, investigations and treatments for albuminuria in line with relevant national and international recommendations.

  • Diabetes
  • Endocrinology
  • Paediatrics

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Introduction

Moderately increased albuminuria (formerly microalbuminuria) is one of the first markers of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and is associated with increased risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications and mortality in people with diabetes.1 2 It is defined as a urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) between 3 and 30 mg/mmol or an albumin excretion of 20–200 µg/min. Levels above these cut-offs indicate severely increased albuminuria (formerly termed macroalbuminuria or proteinuria). Epidemiological studies indicate that albuminuria occurs in 5–26% of adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) after 5–10 years from diagnosis, and in 22.8% of young people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with 0–15 years’ diabetes duration.3

The International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) and American Diabetes Association (ADA) recently updated their guidelines4 5 on the management of albuminuria in children and young people with diabetes. Previous ISPAD and ADA guidelines, as well as the latest guidelines from England’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE),6 are not as clear in their recommendations on what to do next if raised albuminuria is detected. All the aforementioned guidelines now define raised albuminuria as a urinary ACR of ≥3 mg/mmol (≥30 mg/g).4–6 The updated ISPAD and ADA guidelines also give clearer and largely complementary advice on subsequent steps for investigation and, if necessary, treatment.

This 15-minute consultation will illustrate the application of the guidelines to screen for, investigate and treat raised albuminuria through a composite case of a young person with T1D.

Case

A 15-year-old boy with T1D was seen in clinic for a routine diabetes annual review. He had been diagnosed with T1D 5 years previously and his diabetes was being managed with a closed-loop insulin delivery system (Tandem Control-IQ hybrid closed-loop system) consisting of a Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump, Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitor and an algorithm embedded into the pump that adjusts insulin delivery based on sensor glucose levels. At the time of the review, his HbA1c was above target at 62 mmol/mol (recommended level <48 mmol/mol6) but lower than his measurements from the previous 12 months (74–83 mmol/mol). Since the age of 12 years, in line with NICE guidelines, he had undergone screening for complications of T1D, including urinary ACR, retinopathy screening, foot examination and cardiovascular risk factor checks (table 1).

Table 1

International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD), American Diabetes Association (ADA), and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommendations for annual kidney disease screening in children and young people with diabetes4–6

Screening for DKD

ISPAD, ADA and NICE guidelines recommend annual screening for DKD using ACR, and suggest using an early-morning urine sample to help minimise effects of exercise and postural variation on urinary albumin excretion, which can cause it to rise later in the day.4–6 Screening for DKD and other complications is recommended from age 10 to 12 years due to relatively low risk before puberty.7 In addition, ACR can be more variable in children at a younger age.8 Screening should be based on laboratory ACR and cannot be replaced by a urine dipstick test due to the limited sensitivity and specificity of the latter for albuminuria.9

During his annual review, our young person was found to have an increased ACR of 16.8 mg/mmol in an early-morning urine sample. Raised ACR can be an early sign of DKD, although it can also have other causes, as highlighted in Box 1. The young person did not have any active infection at the time of the assessment and his blood pressure and serum lipid levels were within normal ranges. Increased ACR can often occur during puberty due to suboptimal glycaemic control, pubertal hormonal changes and other risk factors, and it can be transient, intermittent or persistent.10 Due to biological variability, albuminuria should be confirmed in repeated samples, with detection in at least two out of three samples collected over 3–6 months indicating the need for further management (figure 1).4

Box 1

Causes of raised albumin/creatinine ratio4,20

  • Diabetic kidney disease

  • Other kidney diseases

  • Exercise

  • Dehydration

  • Marked hyperglycaemia

  • Urinary tract infection

  • Febrile illness

  • Orthostatic proteinuria

  • Menstrual bleeding

  • Recent ejaculation

Figure 1

Comparison of ISPAD, ADA and NICE guidelines for investigation and management of raised albuminuria.4–6 ACEi, ACE inhibitor; ACR, albumin/creatinine ratio; ADA, American Diabetes Association; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; BP, blood pressure; DKD, diabetic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ISPAD, International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes; NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.

Glomerular filtration rate

In addition to urinary ACR, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is a useful marker of kidney function. The ISPAD and ADA guidelines also recommend including estimated GFR (eGFR) in DKD screening for children and young people with diabetes, although with the limitation of a lack of validated formula to calculate this in youth with T1D. A simplified version of the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) equation, also known as the updated Schwartz formula,11 is commonly used for eGFR calculation in children (Box 2). A recent study comparing methods to estimate GFR in young people with T1D suggested that a sex-adjusted version of the CKiD equation, CKiD1 (Box 2), was more accurate, although this study included no young people aged <17 years and very few with eGFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m2.11 Another study focusing on children with T2D developed and validated the iCARE equation (Box 2) to estimate GFR, although again the prevalence of eGFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the study was very low, and the equation has not yet been validated in young people with T1D.12

Box 2

Equations for calculating eGFR in adolescents with diabetes

Recommended target4: eGFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m2

Type 1 diabetes:

  • CKiD equation11: eGFR=36.5×height/sCr

  • Sex-dependent CKiD1 equation11: eGFR=k×height/sCr, where k=37.0 for males and 33.2 for females

Type 2 diabetes:

  • iCARE equation12: eGFR=50.7 BSA0.816×(height/sCr)0.405×q, where q=1 for males and 0.8994 for females

BSA, body surface area in m2 calculated using the Haycock formula (BSA=weight0.5378×height0.3964×0.024265); CKiD, Chronic Kidney Disease in Children; CKiD1, sex-adjusted version of CKiD; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate in mL/min/1.73 m2, height in cm; sCr, serum creatinine in μmol/L, weight in kg.

For our young person, eGFR using the CKiD1 equation, based on his age, sex, height and serum creatinine level, was 127 mL/min/1.73 m2 (normal).

Investigations

Two subsequent early-morning urine samples were tested 1 and 2 months later, in accordance with ISPAD, ADA and NICE guidelines (figure 1). Both revealed elevated ACRs, at 15.7 mg/mmol and 36.9 mg/mmol, respectively. The latter ACR, at ≥30 mg/mmol (severely increased albuminuria), indicated an additional need for further nephrological investigations according to the ISPAD and NICE guidelines (figure 1). The young person underwent a renal ultrasound scan to exclude non-DKD causes of proteinuria, which showed no pathological findings, and a referral was made to paediatric nephrology.

Management

With three out of three urinary ACRs elevated, increased albuminuria was confirmed, prompting management as outlined in figure 1. It has been demonstrated that achieving good glycaemic control is associated with a reduced risk of progression to, and even regression of, albuminuria.10 13 Since this young person’s HbA1c was elevated (62 mmol/mol), while his blood pressure and lipid levels were normal, the first step was to optimise his glycaemia, before considering starting an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). With education and support, 3 months later, his HbA1c had fallen to 54 mmol/mol and three further repeated ACR samples were all <3 mg/mmol. The young person was therefore returned to annual urinary ACR screening and his referral to paediatric nephrology was rescinded.

The decision to commence a child or young adult on an ACE inhibitor or ARB is not straightforward. While adult studies show that ACE inhibitors and ARBs prevent DKD and reduce progression to, and increase regression of, albuminuria,14 long-term studies in young people with diabetes without hypertension are still sparse. The best available evidence for adolescents with T1D and a mildly elevated ACR (top tertile for the study population, but <3 mg/mmol in >99% of participants) suggests that ACE inhibitors given for 2–4 years can reduce the cumulative incidence of moderately increased albuminuria by ~40%.15 Furthermore, these drugs may have various adverse effects, including hyperkalaemia, hypotensive headache, cough and erectile dysfunction16; this is a particularly important problem in young people as they may end up taking such medications for decades. However, a recent clinical trial investigating ACE inhibitor treatment in adolescents with T1D reported few drug side effects after 2–4 years of treatment, illustrating its safety in the short term.15 To our knowledge, there are no studies on the use of ARBs in children and young people with diabetes. However, a randomised, double-blind, controlled study showed that treatment with ARBs can reduce albuminuria in children without diabetes with chronic kidney disease and established an acceptable safety profile.17 Finally, ACE inhibitors and ARBs have potential teratogenic effects,18 which must be considered when treating adolescent girls. Females of childbearing age should receive appropriate contraception counselling prior to starting treatment.

Conclusion

While cases of increased albuminuria in young people with diabetes may be transient, data show that even transient/intermittent albuminuria is associated with greater risk of cardiorenal complications in people with diabetes, and therefore requires monitoring. The clinical bottom line illustrated by our case study is outlined in Box 3. Our case study was a young person with T1D, but such screening and treatment are arguably even more important in young people with T2D, who have a higher risk of vascular complications, which can be present already at the time of diagnosis, and show faster rates of progression compared with young people with T1D or adults with T2D.19 The complex decision of when and how to manage elevated albuminuria can be made with the help of guidelines, such as those published by ISPAD and ADA.

Box 3

Clinical bottom line

  • Annual screening for albuminuria (using urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR)) in children and young people with diabetes should start from age 10 to 12 years.

  • International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes and American Diabetes Association guidelines help guide investigations and treatment for elevated albuminuria (ACR ≥3 mg/mmol).

  • Optimisation of glycaemic control is crucial for all children and young people with elevated albuminuria, particularly if hyperglycaemia is present.

  • Refer to paediatric nephrology for further investigations if ACR ≥30 mg/mmol.

  • Consider adverse effects and the need for reliable contraception before starting an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker.

Answers to the multiple choice questions

(1) (C) annually; (2) (B) ≥3 mg/mmol; (3) (B) age 11 or puberty; (4) (D) 3–6 months; (5) (A) hypokalaemia.

Test your knowledge

  1. How often should screening for albuminuria be carried out in children and young people with diabetes?

    1. every 3 months

    2. every 6 months

    3. annually

    4. biannually

  2. What is increased albuminuria defined as?

    1. ≥2 mg/mmol

    2. ≥3 mg/mmol

    3. ≥10 mg/mmol

    4. ≥20 mg/mmol

  3. According to ISPAD guidelines, at what age should screening for albuminuria be commenced in individuals with T1D?

    1. age 9 or puberty

    2. age 11 or puberty

    3. age 12 or puberty

    4. age 14 or puberty

  4. Over how many months should repeat samples be performed if the ACR is raised?

    1. 1–2 months

    2. 3–4 months

    3. 1–12 months

    4. 3–6 months

  5. Which of the following is not an adverse effect associated with ACE inhibitors?

    1. hypokalaemia

    2. teratogenicity

    3. cough

    4. hypotension

Answers to the quiz are at the end of the references.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the children and young people with diabetes attending the Weston Centre at Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, upon some of whom the above composite case study was based.

References

Footnotes

  • X @isabellafweber, @l_marcovecchio

  • Contributors LM developed the concept for the article. IW produced the initial draft. IW and BGF created the figures. BGF contributed to writing and case discussion. BGF, CM, LM and EH revised and edited the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final submission.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.