A 5-year-old boy of non-consanguineous Indian descent presented to the emergency department (ED) following a prolonged seizure, preceded by a minor head injury from a low-level unwitnessed fall. The seizure was described as focal with head and neck version to the right. There was urinary and faecal incontinence and foaming at the mouth. The seizure lasted for 30 min, following which the child made a rapid recovery and had no neurological deficit when examined in the ED. His initial observations were unremarkable, with him being afebrile, normotensive and having a blood sugar of 4.6 mmol/L.
Question 1 Which imaging modality, if any, should be performed?
Question 2 Initial imaging showed two parenchymal lesions, one within the left frontal lobe and the other in the right parietal lobe with possible areas of blood or calcification. MRI (figure 1A,B) was urgently undertaken and reported as likely to be either haemorrhage into cavernomatous malformations, haemorrhagic metastases or haemorrhage within infected lesions such as tuberculomas.
What would be the most useful next step in view of the differential diagnosis?
CT chest and abdomen
Perform a C-reactive protein
Perform a Mantoux test
Refer to neurosurgery
Take a detailed family history
Question 3 As the patient remained stable on the ward, with no signs of focal neurology and no mass effects on MRI, a lumbar puncture was performed the following day to exclude tuberculosis (TB) (table 1). What cell appearance would indicate TB infection?
Question 4 A review of the mother’s medical records and MRI scans revealed her to have multiple discrete cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) (figure 2).
In view of this new information, what is the next step in investigating this child?
- accident and emergency
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
CB and P contributed equally.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained from the parents/guardian.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.