Statistics from Altmetric.com
Postmortem examination remains an important investigation in perinatal, infant and child deaths, with additional findings provided in 30–40%.1 Though additional investigations, including genetic testing, are now available, until recently the autopsy procedure had evolved little over centuries. However, the combination of advances in imaging technology, development of less-invasive sampling techniques and expansion of ‘omic’ approaches for fluid and tissue samples, together with reduction in parental acceptance of traditional autopsy are likely to change the way paediatric deaths are investigated.2 It is important that clinicians are aware of changes to postmortem practice, since requests for minimally invasive approaches from bereaved parents and religious communities are likely to become increasingly common. The aim is to appropriately consent for the investigation after death that will best answer the clinical question while being acceptable to parents. This article summarises current and future areas of paediatric autopsy research, including postmortem imaging, molecular biology and discovery-based laboratory approaches such as proteomics and transcriptomics.
Current challenges: evolution of the postmortem examination
Current trends in autopsy research focus on improving acceptability of the postmortem examination, empowering parents who do not accept traditional autopsy for various reasons. Postmortem MRI (PMMRI) shows the greatest promise, as part of a minimally invasive approach; PMMRI with placental examination and other adjunctive investigations (without incisions) …
Funding NJS is supported by an NIHR Senior Investigator award and OJA by an NIHR Clinician Scientist fellowship award (grant number NIHR-CS-012-002). NJS and JCH are partially funded by the Great Ormond Street Hospital Children's Charity and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital.
Disclaimer The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.
Competing interests None declared.
Ethics approval Local Research Ethics Committee.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.