<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://ep.bmj.com">
<title>Education &#x26; Practice Online First</title>
<link>http://ep.bmj.com</link>
<description>Education &#x26; Practice RSS Feed -- Online First</description>
<prism:eIssn>1743-0593</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Archives of Disease in Childhood - Education and Practice</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1743-0585</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-302384v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2013-303936v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2013-304080v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303254av1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303622v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303254v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303622av1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303193v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303186v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.ep.bmj.com/misc/home/ADC_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://hwmaint.ep.bmj.com/misc/home/ADC_95x60.gif">
<title>Archives of Disease in Childhood - Education and Practice</title>
<url>http://hwmaint.ep.bmj.com/misc/home/ADC_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://ep.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-302384v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[How to use: transcutaneous bilirubinometry]]></title>
<link>http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-302384v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence neonatal jaundice guidelines recommend checking the bilirubin level in all infants with visible jaundice. The gold standard for this measurement is total serum bilirubin (TSB). Transcutaneous bilirubinometry (TcB) is an alternative to TSB that has been validated for clinical use through extensive study. TcB provides many advantages over TSB including instantaneous measurements without requiring a painful lab draw. For infants &gt;35&nbsp;weeks gestation, TcB can reliably identify infants at risk for severe hyperbilirubinaemia and can decrease the number of TSB measurements obtained. However, paediatric providers should be aware of limitations in clinical use of TcB including decreasing accuracy at higher bilirubin levels, lack of independently validated nomograms for interpretation and limited research regarding its use during phototherapy.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[O'Connor, M. C., Lease, M. A., Whalen, B. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-05-09T00:00:38-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2012-302384</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:edpract;archdischild-2012-302384</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Bilirubin disorders, Child health, Neonatal health, Physiotherapy, Metabolic disorders]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[How to use: transcutaneous bilirubinometry]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-05-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>INTERPRETATIONS</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2013-303936v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acknowledging and researching treatment uncertainties in paediatric practice: an ethical imperative]]></title>
<link>http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2013-303936v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><qd><p>Illogically, and with no empirical evidence to support it, a mischievous view has been promoted that the interest of the vast number of patients involved in the poorly controlled experiments of informal medical &lsquo;tinkering&rsquo; are less in need of protection than are those of the relatively small number of patients who are involved in planned, properly controlled clinical experiments.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref></p></qd></p><p>What are the responsibilities of paediatricians and other clinicians when there is uncertainty about whether particular treatments are more likely to do good than harm, or vice versa? The General Medical Council's advice to doctors is clear: &lsquo;You must ... help to resolve uncertainties about the effects of treatments&rsquo;. The trouble is that circumstances are stacked against doctors who aspire to this standard. As the British paediatrician Richard Smithells noted decades ago, &lsquo;I need permission to give a drug to half of my patients, but not to give it to...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chalmers, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-04-26T00:01:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2013-303936</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:edpract;archdischild-2013-303936</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Cerebral palsy, Immunology (including allergy), Drugs: infectious diseases, Pregnancy, Reproductive medicine, Child health, Informed consent, Legal and forensic medicine]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acknowledging and researching treatment uncertainties in paediatric practice: an ethical imperative]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-04-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>RESEARCH IN PRACTICE</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2013-304080v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hyperbaric oxygen did not improve symptoms in children with cerebral palsy]]></title>
<link>http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2013-304080v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><st>Study design</st><p><b>Design</b>: Randomised controlled trial.</p><p><b>Allocation</b>: Randomisation was done by university staff. Allocation was concealed using sealed envelopes that were sequentially numbered.</p><p><b>Blinding</b>: All patients, care providers and investigators were blinded. Only hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) technicians were aware of group assignment.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><st>Study question</st><p><b>Setting</b>: Ambulatory HBO clinic in the USA.</p><p><b>Patients</b>: Forty-nine children aged 3 to 8&nbsp;years with spastic cerebral palsy (CP), with no previous HBO treatments, recent thoracic surgery, changes of spasticity medications or history of hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy.</p><p><b>Intervention</b>: Children were randomised to receive either hyperbaric 100% oxygen (HBO) or hyperbaric air (HBA), at 1.5 atmospheres, for 60&nbsp;min, once per weekday for a total of 40 treatments.</p><p><b>Outcomes</b>: Primary outcome was a change in Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) score. A change of more than 5% is considered clinically significant. Secondary outcomes were changes in GMFM dimensions, the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) and the Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA).</p><p><b>Follow-up period</b>: Outcomes...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perez-Gaxiola, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-04-26T00:01:06-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2013-304080</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:edpract;archdischild-2013-304080</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Clinical trials (epidemiology), Cerebral palsy, Pain (neurology), Child and adolescent psychiatry (paedatrics), Child health, Autism, Pervasive developmental disorder, Complementary medicine, Disability, Competing interests (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hyperbaric oxygen did not improve symptoms in children with cerebral palsy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-04-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PICKET</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303254av1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acneiform eruptions]]></title>
<link>http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303254av1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><st>Answers</st><p><I>From questions on page</I> .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><st>ANSWER TO Question 1</st><p>The answer is (D), acne neonatorum. This, perhaps more accurately called neonatal cephalic pustulosis, is a benign condition that typically presents shortly after birth and resolves within the first 1&ndash;2&nbsp;months of life. Infants present with acneiform papules and pustules, frequently located on the cheeks and forehead and sometimes on the chest. Neonatal cephalic pustulosis lacks the comedones of acne vulgaris. <I>Malassezia furfur</I> or <I>M sympodialis</I> colonisation may play a role in the aetiology of this condition, and the treatment consists of watchful waiting or, if necessary, topical antifungal creams.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref></p></sec><sec id="s3"><st>ANSWER TO Question 2</st><p>The answer is (B), periorificial dermatitis. This, also known as perioral dermatitis, is a common benign condition that can occur in children or adults. Classically, lesions appear as skin coloured-erythematous monomorphic papules measuring 1&ndash;2&nbsp;mm. These papules can appear on the perioral region, nose, cheeks and periocular region....]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lio, P. A., Lee, K. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-02-27T00:01:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2012-303254a</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:edpract;archdischild-2012-303254a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Journalology, Drugs: infectious diseases, Drugs: CNS (not psychiatric), Epilepsy and seizures, Child health, Disability, Dentistry and oral medicine, Dermatology, Screening (epidemiology), Competing interests (ethics), Screening (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acneiform eruptions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>DERMATOPHILE</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303622v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Brown birthmarks]]></title>
<link>http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303622v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Answers to the following quiz questions can be found on page</b> .</p><p><textbox id="box1"><p>Select one best answer from the following:<l type="letterupper"><li><p>Neurofibromatosis type 1</p></li><li><p>Nevus spilus</p></li><li><p>McCune&ndash;Albright syndrome</p></li><li><p>Caf&eacute;-au-lait macule</p></li><li><p>Multiple lentigenes syndrome (LEOPARD)</p></li><li><p>Nevus of Ito (nevus fuscoceruleus acromiodeltoideus)</p></li><li><p>Giant congenital melanocytic nevus</p></li><li><p>Carney syndrome</p></li></l></p></textbox></p><sec id="s1"><st>Question 1</st><p><I>Case 1</I>: A 5-year-old boy presents with a birthmark in his right axilla (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="EDPRACT2012303622F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). His mother states that she first noticed a faint brown birthmark in that area when he was an infant. However, she is concerned because more and more darker &lsquo;brown spots&rsquo; have started to appear within the original birthmark over the past year. The patient is in excellent health and has no significant personal or family medical history. He is the only person in the family with this type of birthmark. On physical examination, there is a unilateral 10<FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT>10&nbsp;cm tan patch with multiple superimposed 1&ndash;3&nbsp;mm brown macules and papules. What is the most likely diagnosis?</p></sec><sec id="s2"><st>Question...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lio, P. A., Lee, K. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-02-27T00:01:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2012-303622</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:edpract;archdischild-2012-303622</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Journalology, Clinical genetics, Child health, Rheumatology, Competing interests (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Brown birthmarks]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>DERMATOPHILE</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303254v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acneiform eruptions]]></title>
<link>http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303254v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><b>Answers to the following quiz questions can be found on page</b> .</p><sec id="s2"><st>Question 1</st><p><I>Case 1</I>: A 3-week-old infant presents with multiple pustules on his face. Lesions have been present for 1&nbsp;week and do not appear to bother the infant. The child was born via uncomplicated vaginal delivery at 39&nbsp;weeks. The mother did not receive prenatal care until 22&nbsp;weeks of pregnancy, when she realised she was pregnant. She is worried that her child might have &lsquo;caught something&rsquo; from a sick sibling at home. On physical examination, the child is well appearing, but there are multiple pustules distributed on the forehead, nose and bilateral cheeks (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="EDPRACT2012303254F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). What is the diagnosis?</p></sec><sec id="s3"><st>Question 2</st><p><I>Case 2</I>: A 7-year-old boy presents with complaints of a rash on his chin, cheeks and nose. These lesions initially started around his mouth 2&nbsp;months ago. His mother thought that they were related to eczema and applied topical...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lio, P. A., Lee, K. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-02-27T00:01:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2012-303254</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:edpract;archdischild-2012-303254</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Journalology, Drugs: infectious diseases, Pregnancy, Reproductive medicine, Child health, Dermatology, Competing interests (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acneiform eruptions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>DERMATOPHILE</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303622av1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Brown birthmarks]]></title>
<link>http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303622av1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><st>Answers</st><p><I>From questions on page</I> .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><st>ANSWER TO Question 1</st><p>The answer is (B), nevus spilus. This lesion is characteristic of a nevus spilus, also known as speckled lentiginous nevus. Typically, nevus spilus presents as a tan-brown patch with superimposed brown nevi that develop over time. It is found in 1.7/1000 newborns, with boys and girls being equally affected. Parents often give a history of noticing the macular component at birth or shortly thereafter, with the gradual appearance of more and more individual nevi within the area. This lesion is benign, and the risk of melanoma developing within this lesion is similar to that of benign melanocytic nevi present elsewhere on the body.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> Nevus spilus can appear anywhere on the body but is usually found on the trunk and extremities.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><st>ANSWER TO Question 2</st><p>The answer is (A), neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1). These multiple caf&eacute;-au-lait macules are concerning for NF-1...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lio, P. A., Lee, K. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2013-02-27T00:01:14-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2012-303622a</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:edpract;archdischild-2012-303622a</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Journalology, Eye Diseases, Neuromuscular disease, Neurooncology, Reproductive medicine, Ophthalmology, Child health, Rheumatology, Sexual health, Dermatology, Competing interests (ethics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Brown birthmarks]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2013-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>DERMATOPHILE</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303193v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Interesting image - is something missing?]]></title>
<link>http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303193v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><p>Hemihydraenecephaly can be compatible with life. A 21-year-old who was known to have had developmental delay and a persistent left sided hemiplegia had brain imaging (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="EDPRACT2012303193F1">figure 1</cross-ref>), (never previously completed in his life), after an episode of status epilepticus to show hemihydraenecephaly. Although it is a rare condition, it is generally thought to be incompatible with life and therefore counselling if picked up antenatally should remain guarded, but perhaps a little more optimistic.</p><p>I hope you do look at the full article. I have not previously seen this finding on imaging: it does appear genuinely amazing.</p><p>Alternatively I hope this encourages you to send in your own examples of interesting images to <I>BMJ Case Reports</I>: a positive new development is that all published cases are now indexed on PubMed.</p></sec><p><fn><no>Provenance and peer review</no><p>Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.</p></fn></p><p><fig loc="float" id="EDPRACT2012303193F1"><no>Figure&nbsp;1</no><caption><p>T1W MRI of brain, coronal view showing an absent right hemisphere replaced...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Almeida, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-12-25T00:00:50-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2012-303193</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:edpract;archdischild-2012-303193</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Journalology, Epilepsy and seizures, Neuroimaging, Child and adolescent psychiatry (paedatrics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Interesting image - is something missing?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-12-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>WHAT I HAVE LEARNED FROM BMJ CASE REPORTS</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303186v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diagnosis: clinician's gut feeling helps detect children with serious infection]]></title>
<link>http://ep.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303186v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><p><b>Questions</b>: In children with acute illness (patient) does gut feeling (test) rule in or rule out serious infections (outcome)?</p><sec id="s1"><st>Methods</st><p><b>Design:</b> Prospective cohort study of children 0&ndash;16&nbsp;years.</p><p><b>Setting</b>: Primary care, general practitioners or community paediatricians. Flanders, Belgium.</p><p><b>Patients</b> The study included 3890 children aged 0&ndash;16&nbsp;years, presenting with an acute illness of less than 5&nbsp;days duration.</p><p><b>Diagnostic strategy</b> At the initial consultation the following were recorded:<l type="ord"><li><p>A list of clinical features was made, on which an objective clinical impression was based.</p></li><li><p>The clinician also recorded their gut feeling, defined as an intuitive feeling that something was wrong even if the clinician was unsure why.</p></li></l></p><p>Subsequently a panel, blinded to the initial clinical evaluation, made the final diagnosis of serious infection, based on hospital records and clinicians&rsquo; follow-up information. Association of gut feeling with specific clinical features or with clinician experience was analysed using logistic regression.</p><p><b>Outcomes</b> Of 3890 children, 21 were admitted to the hospital with a serious...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wacogne, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-11-15T00:01:00-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2012-303186</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:edpract;archdischild-2012-303186</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Urology, Epidemiologic studies, Pneumonia (infectious disease), TB and other respiratory infections, Epilepsy and seizures, Child health, Renal medicine, Pneumonia (respiratory medicine), Rheumatology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diagnosis: clinician's gut feeling helps detect children with serious infection]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-11-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>STRUCTURED ABSTRACTS OF SENTINEL ARTICLES: PICKET</prism:section>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>