Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Thickening of the internal anal sphincter in idiopathic constipation in children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thickening of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) is observed in chronic idiopathic constipation (IC) and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS), where it has been correlated with the presence and severity of rectal intussusception. Alternatively, thickened IAS may be a feature of the obstructed megarectum in a similar way to the hypertrophy of bladder neck seen in dyssynergic bladders. The aim of this study was to investigate the significance of thickening of the IAS in children with chronic IC and to determine any association between the thickened IAS and anorectal manometry findings and patient’s symptoms. A total of 144 children were admitted for investigations and treatment of chronic IC and evaluated prospectively between April 2001 and April 2003. IAS thickness was measured by endosonography using B&K axial endosonic probe type 1850 with a 10-MHz rotating transducer. The thickness of IAS was measured at 3, 6, and 9 o’clock, and the mean value of the three measurements was used for analysis. Functional assessment was done by anorectal manometry pressure studies under ketamine anaesthesia. A validated symptom score (SS) was used to assess the severity of symptoms. The sum of SS ranged between 0 and 65. Spearman’s rho two-tailed test was used to correlate the thickness of IAS with patients’ symptoms and anorectal manometry findings. Results were expressed as median and range and p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Of 144 children, 84 were boys, median age 8.1 years (range 3.1–15). Soiling was present in 137 (94%) patients, delay in defecation in 132 (91%), and a palpable megarectum on abdominal examination in 117 (80%). The median duration of symptoms and duration of laxative treatment were 4 years (range 0.3–14.5) and 3.3 years (0.2–13.5), respectively. The average severity score for soiling, delay in defecation, palpable megarectum, and the total SS were 8 (range 0–10), 5 (0–10), 2 (0–12), and 33 (11–51), respectively. The median thickness of IAS was 0.9 mm (range 0.3–2.8) and the median resting anal sphincter pressure was 54 mmHg (19–107). The median amplitudes of rectal and anal sphincter contraction were 3 mmHg (1–25) and 9 mmHg (1–35), respectively. The thickness of IAS correlated significantly with total symptom severity score (r=0.31, p=0.0001), soiling score (r=0.28, p=0.001), megarectum score on abdominal palpation (r=0.29, p=0.001), size of megarectum on manometry (r=0.36, p=0.0001), amplitude of rectal contraction (r=0.23, p=0.007), and age of patient (r=0.55, p=0.0001). There was also a significant correlation between the amplitude of rectal and anal sphincter contraction (r=0.32, p=0.0001). There was no correlation between thickness of IAS and resting anal sphincter pressure and amplitude of anal sphincter contraction on anorectal manometry study. A total of 24 children had myectomy of thickened and overactive IAS in addition to the medical treatment of their chronic IC. The histology examination of myectomy specimen with eosin and haematoxylin staining and histochemical acetylcholine esterase staining showed smooth muscle fibres and ganglion cells. Thickening of IAS correlates significantly with duration and severity of symptoms, size of megarectum, and amplitude of rectal contraction. The pathogenesis is secondary to the continuous presence of faeces in the rectum, resulting in chronic abnormal stimulus to the IAS, which leads to hypertrophic changes in the rectum wall and IAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2a, b
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5a, b

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartram CI, Frudinger A (1997) Handbook of anal endosonography. Wrightson Biomedical Publishing, Petersfield, UK

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartram CI, Sultan AH (1995) Anal endosonography in faecal incontinence. Gut 37:4–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Benninga MA, Wijers OB, van der Hoeven CW, Taminiau JA, Klopper PJ, Tytgat GN, Akkermans LM (1994) Manometry profilometry, and endosonography: normal physiology and anatomy of the anal canal in healthy children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 18:68–77

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clayden GS, Lawson JON (1976) Investigation and management of long-standing chronic constipation in childhood. Arch Dis Child 51:918–923

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clayden GS, Keshtgar AS (2004) The use of a parent-completed symptom severity score in chronic childhood constipation and soiling (paper submitted for publication)

  6. Callaghan RP, Nixon HH (1964) Megarectum: physiological observations. Arch Dis Child 39:153–157

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Denny-Brown D, Robertson EG (1935) An investigation of the nervous control of defecation. Brain 58:256

    Google Scholar 

  8. Diamant NE, Kamm MA, Wald A, Whitehead WE (1999) American gastroenterological association medical position statement on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology 116:732–760

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Duthie HI, Watts JM (1965) Contribution of the external anal sphincter to the pressure zone in the anal canal. Gut 6:64–68

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frenckner B, Euler CH (1975) Influence of pudendal block on the function of the anal sphincters. Gut 16:482–489

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gantke B, Schafer A, Enck P, Lubke HJ (1993) Sonographic, manometric, and myographic evaluation of the anal sphincters morphology and function. Dis Colon Rectum 36:1037–1041

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gibbons CP, Trowbridge EA, Bannister JJ, Read NW (1986) Role of anal cushions in maintaining continence. Lancet 1:886–887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hosie GP, Spitz L (1997) Idiopathic constipation in childhood is associated with thickening of the internal anal sphincter. J Pediatr Surg 32:1041–1044

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Keshtgar AS, Sanei A, Ward HC (2003) Manometry data analysis for windows in clinical practice. Presented in the 15th international research symposium in pediatric surgery, Marseille, 3–4 October 2003

  15. Lesta B, Penninckx F, Kerremans R (1989) The composition of anal basal pressure. An in vivo and in vitro study in man. Int J Colorectal Dis 4:118–122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Loening-Bauke V (1993) Constipation in early childhood: patient characteristics, treatment, and longterm follow up. Gut 34:1400–1404

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Loening-Bauke VA (1984) Abnormal rectoanal function in children recovered from chronic constipation and encopresis. Gastroenterology 87:1299–1304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Marshall M, Halligan S, Fotheringham T, Bartram C, Nicholls RJ (2002) Predictive value of internal anal sphincter thickness for diagnosis of rectal intussusception in patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Br J Surg 89:1281–1285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Meunier P, Marechal JM, DeBeaujeu MJ (1979) Rectoanal pressures and rectal sensitivity studies in chronic childhood constipation. Gastroenterology 71:774–779

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nixon HH (1967) Megarectum in the older child. Proc R Soc Med 60:29–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Papadopoulou A, Clayden GS, Booth IW (1994) The clinical value of solid marker transit studies in childhood constipation and soiling. Eur J Pediatr 153:560–564

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Paskins JR, Lawson JON, Clayden GS (1984) The effect of ketamine anesthesia on anorectal manometry. J Pediatr Surg 19:289–291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Plas van der RN, Benninga MA, Buller HA, Bossuyt PM, Akkermans LMA, Redekop WK, Taminiau JA (1996) Biofeedback training in treatment of childhood constipation: a randomised controlled study. Lancet 348:776–780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schuster MM, Hookman P, Hendrix TR, Mendeloff AI (1965) Simultaneous manometric recording of internal and external anal sphincter reflexes. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 116:79

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schweiger M (1979) Method for determining individual contributions of voluntary and involuntary anal sphincters to resting tone. Dis Colon Rectum 22:415–416

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI (1994) Prospective study of the extent of internal anal sphincter division during lateral sphincterotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1031–1033

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Nicholls JR, Bartram CI (1994) Endosonography of the anal sphincters: normal anatomy and comparison with manometry. Clin Radiol 49:368–374

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Talbot IC, Nicholls RJ, Bartram CI (1994) Anal endosonography for identifying external sphincter defects confirmed histologically. Br J Surg 81:463–465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sun WM, Read NW, Donelly TC, Bannister JJ, Shorthouse AJ (1989) A common pathophysiology for full thickness rectal prolapse, anterior mucosal prolapse and solitary rectal ulcer. Br J Surg 76:290–295

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Outryve MJ, Pelckmans PA, Fierens H, Van Maerke YM (1993) Transrectal ultrasound study of the pathogenesis of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Gut 34:1422–1426

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tjandra JJ, Milsom JW, Stolfi VM, Lavery I, Oakley J, Church J, Fazio V (1992) Endoluminal ultrasound defines anatomy of the anal canal and pelvic floor. Dis Colon Rectum 35:465–470

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tjandra JJ, Milsom JW, Schroeder T, Fazio VW (1993) Endoluminal ultrasound is preferable to electromyography in mapping anal sphincteric defects. Dis Colon Rectum 36:689–692

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wald A, Chandra R, Chiponis D, Gabel S (1987) Anorectal function and continence mechanisms in childhood encopresis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 6:915–922

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang YS, Kamm MA, Engel AF, Talbot IC (1996) Pathology of the rectal wall in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and complete rectal prolapse. Gut 38:587–590

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza S. Keshtgar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keshtgar, A.S., Ward, H.C., Clayden, G.S. et al. Thickening of the internal anal sphincter in idiopathic constipation in children. Ped Surgery Int 20, 817–823 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-004-1233-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-004-1233-4

Keywords

Navigation