Recommendation grades and levels of evidence

GradeEvidence
RCT, randomised controlled trial.
AAt least one high quality meta-analysis, systematic review, or RCT with a very low risk of bias, and directly applicable to the target population; or a systematic review of RCTs or a body of evidence consisting principally of studies with a low risk of bias, directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results
BA body of evidence including high quality systematic reviews of case–control or cohort studies, or high quality case–control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding, bias, or chance and a high probability that the relationship is causal, directly applicable to the target population, and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or extrapolated evidence from at least one high quality meta-analysis, systematic review, or RCT with a very low risk of bias, or from a systematic review of RCTs or a body of evidence consisting principally of studies with a low risk of bias, and demonstrating overall consistency of results
CA body of evidence including well conducted case–control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding, bias, or chance and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal, directly applicable to the target population and demonstrating overall consistency of results; or extrapolated evidence from high quality systematic reviews of case–control or cohort studies, or high quality case–control or cohort studies with a very low risk of confounding, bias, or chance and a high probability that the relationship is causal
DNon-analytic studies—for example, case reports, case series—or expert opinion; or extrapolated evidence from well conducted case–control or cohort studies with a low risk of confounding, bias, or chance and a moderate probability that the relationship is causal