rss
Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 96:112-118 doi:10.1136/adc.2008.145565
  • Review

Analgosedation in neonates: do we still need additional tools after 30 years of clinical research?

  1. Karel Allegaert2
  1. 1University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  2. 2Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospitals, Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
  1. Correspondence to Dr K Allegaert, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Division of Woman and Child, University Hospital, Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; karel.allegaert{at}uz.kuleuven.ac.be
  • Accepted 19 January 2011
  • Published Online First 28 February 2011

Abstract

Approximately 30 years ago, the myth that nervous system immaturity precluded neonates from pain perception and its negative effects was rejected. Neurobiologists further explored neurodevelopmental nociception. These observations strongly suggest that early pain experience contributes to neurodevelopmental outcome, pain thresholds, pain or stress-related behaviour and physiological responses in later life. Effective management of pain therefore remains an important indicator of the quality of care provided to neonates, not only from an ethical, but also from a short and long-term outcome perspective. Simultaneously, neonatal care itself has changed and data on neuro-apoptosis and impaired synaptogenesis following exposure to analgosedatives emerged. When developmental pharmacology concepts are applied to neonatal analgosedation, this means that this should be based on systematic assessment, followed by titrated administration of the most appropriate analgesic(s) with subsequent re-assessment to adapt treatment. This review will focus on the limitations of the available assessment tools, newly emerging analgosedatives in neonates to illustrate how these compounds can be integrated into the changing concepts of neonatal care.

Footnotes

  • Funding KA is supported by the Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders (Belgium) (F.W.O. Vlaanderen) by a fundamental clinical investigatorship (1800209 N).

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Register for free content

Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of ADC Education & Practice.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

Navigate This Article